Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:40:21 -0400 From: "MikeM" <MyRaQ@mgm51.com> To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, ahl@austclear.com.au (Tony Landells) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hogwash Message-ID: <200206250940210524.03A3F77E@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <200206250625.QAA01010@caligula.anu.edu.au> References: <200206250625.QAA01010@caligula.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/25/02 at 4:25 PM Darren Reed wrote: > What benefit are we *really* getting from their "code audits" ? ============= We are getting the benefit of all the security bugs and issues that they *have* found and fixed before they were found by others. Do I expect the security audits to catch everything? No. To have that expectation would be unreasonable. Do I feel that proactive security is better than reactive security? Yes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206250940210524.03A3F77E>