Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 02:33:42 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <3E407806.4000401@cream.org> In-Reply-To: <xzplm0vzcrh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200302041944.h14JiSaX076743@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3E406467.8020500@cream.org> <xzpwukfzedb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3E4071F4.7090007@cream.org> <xzplm0vzcrh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> writes: > > >>I said that if -core can't describe exactly what happened then a >>statement giving the jist of the problem and their reasons for their >>actions would be good enough. >> >> > >You already got that. No less than two core team members have >expressed their view on what happened and why on -chat. Not core's >fault that you weren't paying attention. > > You're right. Except that I was paying attention, and I read those posts with interest. My standing point is that we only got those statements for -core members because this conversation was kicked off by our troll. It was probably only a matter of time before someone noticed what had happened and posted to -chat, but there was more than 24-hours between the commit being made and someone noticing. It would be better IMHO if -core had simply made a statement at the time - I feel that much, but certainly not all, of this thread would have been avoided. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E407806.4000401>