Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:52:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hoek@hwcn.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971012204610.14368C-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <199710130007.RAA02182@usr05.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > So would the combined annoyance of its existance copuled with the > annoyance of not shutting it up when it's possible to kludge it to > shut it up be enought to put it over the "do something significant > about it" threshold? > > How about combining both of those with discussions like this one? 8-) 8-) 8-). But then what would we spend our Thanksgiving weekends arguing over!? [dev]fs design? Ugh! Yuck! ;-) Naw, these discussions are counter-incentive. If you really wanted to add incentive, you'd be quiet and just agree! [Well, Thanksgiving weekend over here, anyways...] -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.971012204610.14368C-100000>