Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:10:28 +0000 From: Simon Dick <simond@irrelevant.org> To: Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tpop3d experience ? Message-ID: <1080213028.94023.16.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040324145054.K23306@thunder.xecu.net> References: <20040321202625.GR7109@complx.LF.net> <20040322142823.GA32786@ns2.wananchi.com> <20040324145054.K23306@thunder.xecu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:54, Andy Dills wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > * Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net> [20040321 23:26]: wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'm researching other POP server options besides qpopper > > > on servers with many (6K+) and sometimes large (200MB+) pop boxes > > > in maildir configuration. > > > > > > Is someone using tpop3d ? Care to share your experience ? > > > > I have over 10k user accounts from /etc/passwd (system users, > > without shells) and over 4k users from MySQL. > > I run tpop3d-1.5.3 (actually I've been running it since those > > early days of 1.3.x) and I must say I am very happy with it. > > Before that, I did run other pop3 daemons but they lacked the > > flexibility I wanted. This is an ISP enviroment, using Maildir > > for both system accounts and DB based users. > > > > With tpop3d, you can't go wrong! > > For what it's worth, qmail's pop3d is also pretty solid. Very small, very > lightweight, and you get to write your own password authentication if you > want. > > For an MTA however, I don't use qmail, I use postfix (but with maildir). > > Although, this thread has convinced me to try out tpop3d...I'll definitely > give it a look. Give teapop a look too, I find that works very well too
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1080213028.94023.16.camel>