Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:27:52 -0800 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: GPL vs BSD Licence Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEEAPHAA.davids@webmaster.com> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNKEJGEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have, and while I don't bash them, I disagree with many of their > > interpretations > > > because they don't seem to reflect any understanding > > whatsoever of copyright law. > > What you just said there was a bash. Not a bash. It's a indisputable fact that there are wacko GPL advocates who have no understanding of copyright law at all and just assume that it works the naive way they think it should work. They say things as absurd as that one work can be a derivative work of another even though the authors of that work never saw any of the work it's supposed to be derivative of. There are wackos on the other side too, of course. DS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEEAPHAA.davids>