Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:05 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby18 fails as dependecy of sysutils/portupgrade with make: don't know how to make INSTALLS_DEPENDS Message-ID: <p06110415bd2dbf38487e@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20040728223439.783ab556@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20040727233948.15640c99@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040728184935.GA715@voodoo.laverenz.de> <20040728223439.783ab556@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:34 PM +0300 7/28/04, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:49:35 +0200 >Uwe Laverenz <uwe@laverenz.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:39:48PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> > > > This happens on a 5.2.1-RELEASE with ports up-to-date, with > > > only perl, postfix and cvsup-without-gui installed. > > > > I guess this happens because you use -RELEASE and not RELENG_5_2. > > If you update the base system to 5.2.1-p9 you get some fixes that > > will satisfy the ruby port (probably the OpenSSL bug, see below *). > >I see. My plan was to update to -CURRENT and see how this little >Pentium 120MHz behaves, but since current's waters seems to be >very troubled right now I postponed that. Your plan is a very reasonable one. Note that RELENG_5_2 is an actual CVS tag, and it is *NOT* the same as 5.2-current. It is 5.2-RELEASE plus a very few security fixes. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06110415bd2dbf38487e>