Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:06:35 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>, FreeBSD Java <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Are syscall wrappers needed in JNI? Message-ID: <15007.46843.84717.169363@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20010302183610.A69992@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <3A9AE85F.C6F06D96@vangelderen.org> <15002.60084.89087.467979@nomad.yogotech.com> <3A9EF71F.A13189C6@vangelderen.org> <15006.63617.145790.5705@nomad.yogotech.com> <05bd01c0a2e9$a1b669e0$0e05a8c0@coffee> <20010302183610.A69992@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Interesting enough, from my memory, select is wrapped in the JVM, but > > > poll was not. > > > > I was talking about jdk1.2.2. For the version I was starting to use > > commapi, select was not wrapped, but poll was. You can even find > > discussion about this on freebsd-java mailing list, I think. If I > > remember > > correctly the reason for select not being wrapped was that JVM was > > internally using poll and thus patchers assumed that there was not need > > to wrap select. > > Ari is correct. select() isn't wrapped in patchset 10. However, it is > wrapped again in the current repository version. It was wrapped in > some patchsets too. So Nate is also correct :). Thanks for the clarification. I'm suprised anything prior to patchset 11 worked reliably with AWT worked, because Motif internally uses select. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15007.46843.84717.169363>