Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 21:02:35 -0800 From: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem building dev/e1000 Message-ID: <77EDD0AB-BAAC-460F-B2E1-46ABA5045178@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23655.5954.25347.254867@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <23653.56460.521599.489556@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <754B5C21-656B-4A67-BA39-50BB4AF5C0CD@gmail.com> <CAKdFRZjdR0%2BMEFhApLcV5me8Nt=R7F1yOoW34owQYne-T9Ehmg@mail.gmail.com> <652F1541-52DE-4744-8AEA-8EE6434E04E8@gmail.com> <39629f6cb41cff32b348cf5d329d425352c28464.camel@freebsd.org> <0b234c9e-7799-e956-997c-c34762d57f4b@FreeBSD.org> <23655.5954.25347.254867@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 11:47, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > > Lev Serebryakov writes: > >>> My question would be: why? If some drivers have a new >>> dependency on iflib, why isn't that expressed in sys/conf/files >>> and handled automatically? >> >> My question exactly. > > I am so glad people who know what they're talking about have the > same response I did. :-) I totally missed the part where Robert said he was compiling it into the kernel. Also, I remember the days when drivers didn’t automatically compile in dependent options (example: “device re” requires “device miibus”). I guess things have changed a bit in the past year [while I was away] with some drivers? Thanks, -Enji > > Respectcfully, > > > Robert Huff > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77EDD0AB-BAAC-460F-B2E1-46ABA5045178>