Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:03:20 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel-lucent.com.au> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still want CTM? Message-ID: <4A78DA58.5060904@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090805000550.GE4145@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4A77A0EE.3060602@missouri.edu> <20090804031753.GP98247@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com> <4A77B32F.3040208@missouri.edu> <20090804061049.GB20414@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <4A78BD8D.3050801@missouri.edu> <20090805000550.GE4145@pjdesk.au.alcatel-lucent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2009-Aug-04 18:00:29 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> wrote: >> The vast majority of the effort is spent on updating cvs-cur. If I >> discovered that no-one wants this branch, that would be a huge saving of >> time. > > Just to be difficult, that's the branch I use - I find it most > convenient to replicate the repository and then I can pull out > anything I want. I'll keep cvs-cur. > > Maybe you can get some statistics on the number of subscribers to each > of the ctm mailing lists as well as statistics for ctm downloads via FTP. Someday, perhaps, I'll do this as well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A78DA58.5060904>