Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:18:07 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usbdevs changes Message-ID: <200707161718.07845.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <20070716.075801.387192862.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200707161535.30980.hselasky@c2i.net> <20070716.075801.387192862.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 16 July 2007 15:58, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200707161535.30980.hselasky@c2i.net> > > Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes: > : Hi, > : > : I need to get the following confirmed. > : > : I'm doing an integrate and I have found that the following entries > : in "usbdevs" have changed value, comparing my version with the official > : version. Can anyone confirm this ASAP? > : > : Switched around: > : > : 0x09d7 vendor NOVATEL Novatel > : 0x1410 vendor NOVATEL2 Novatel > > Yes. This has changed on purpose, to try to help harmonize between *BSD. > > : 0x0681 vendor SIEMENS2 Siemens > : 0x11f5 vendor SIEMENS3 Siemens > > Yes. This has changed on purpose, to try to help harmonize between *BSD. > The two above has been resolved. > : Changed: > : > : 0x2000 product ATEN UC210T > : 0x2009 product ATEN UC210T > > I'll have to investigate this one. I didn't think I was to the > 'change the products' phase of my merging yet, just the 'add products' > and 'harmonize product names' phase. Thanks for pointing it out. > I've checked with Linux, NetBSD and OpenBSD, and they use 0x2009, so I think it is a typo. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707161718.07845.hselasky>