Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 13:04:39 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libz.so.1.0 where are you? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960928130350.29786A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <v02140b08ae7233f6f22e@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Sep 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > >> Is there some reason that the library was not brought into the -stable tree? > > > >None that I see, just a matter of testing and time. > > IMHO, even untested, inclusion is better than NOT AVAILABLE. > Wrong.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960928130350.29786A-100000>