Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:46:09 -0400 From: Mathew Kanner <mat@cnd.mcgill.ca> To: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Joseph Dunn <joseph@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sound/pci emu10k1.c Message-ID: <20040614154609.GA59476@cnd.mcgill.ca> In-Reply-To: <40CCFCDF.4040303@freebsd.org> References: <200406132212.i5DMC3b9075832@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040614011012.H1600@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20040614010854.GA98360@dragon.nuxi.com> <40CCFCDF.4040303@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 13, Scott Long wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:10:12AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > >>On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:12:02PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > >> > >>>obrien 2004-06-13 22:12:02 UTC > >>> > >>> FreeBSD src repository > >>> > >>> Modified files: > >>> sys/dev/sound/pci emu10k1.c > >>> Log: > >>> Add PCI identifier for Dell modified SBLive! card > >>> > >>> Submitted by: Joseph Dunn <joseph@magnesium.net> > >> > >>Wasn't there consensus that simply adding its PCI ID isn't enough to > >>get this card working? > > > > > >Possibly. Still doesn't mean we shouldn't add the PCI ID to help people > >farther along in determining if it really works or not. If we get > >reliable failure reports in 5-CURRENT (which has a much updated driver > >from 5.2.1) we can print out an error message in the probe. > > > > Well, this is kinda like finding a new Adaptec ID and adding it to the > ahc driver just because it's there, regardless of whether the driver can > talk to the chip. I'm not sure what sentiment Scott has but I think that this change is a mistake. At this point, I think that this card just won't work withe emu10k1 driver. --Mat -- Any idiot can face a crisis; it is this day-to-day living that wears you out. - Chekhov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614154609.GA59476>