Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 14:07:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: root@dva.in-berlin.de, phk@ref.tfs.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? Message-ID: <199506122107.OAA02998@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199506122052.WAA17662@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jun 12, 95 10:52:23 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > with 99% probability of being right what is now in the ctm area is the > > 2.0.5R bits since I allowed the last update_usrall to finish before I > > stop the cronjob to do the tag operation. Infact I would say with > > 99.999999% probablility :-). I have not started any of this up so > > if you check right now you will get it. > > The last cvs-cur received here was : > > CTM_BEGIN 2.0 cvs-cur 770 19950610200001Z . > > It was just before you closed CTM for the tagging/merge after the release. > I'd say what all CTMers have is either -current (stopped around June, 1st) or > 2.0.5R if src-cur was made from the RELENG_2_0_5 branch and not from > -current (which I doubt). DO I HAVE TO YELL THIS, /usr/src on freefall WAS on the RELENG_2_0_5 branch 2 days after I branched the thing!!!! Thus all SUP sites and all CTM sites HAVE 2.0.5R as of what they can get RIGHT NOW. I will be opening the flood gate in about 6 hours and you will be getting the -current bits that are now headed for 2.2, please read -current mail from me about FreeBSD 2.0.5/2.1/2.2. > So I think all src-cur CTMers have -current without last 2.0.5 fixes... > cvs-cur CTMers have anything they extract :-) > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG > FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506122107.OAA02998>