Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:21:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, reilly@zeta.org.au, tom@uniserve.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up on LFS Message-ID: <199808062321.SAA01224@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <199808061438.IAA12182@mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Thu, 6 Aug 1998 08:38:27 -0600) References: <19980806112955.A4299@reilly.home> <199808060606.XAA22855@usr09.primenet.com> <199808061438.IAA12182@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I know, I've tried and have benchmarks to prove it. Using 100% of > the CPU for minutes at a time, I still get the GC kicking in using > Sun's JVM implementation. (The M$ implementation is notorious for > doing bad things since it uses a different reaping technology, so > it's much less useful for programs that make heavy use of 'new'.) Is there some sort of irony in M$ not working well with memory-hungry programs? Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808062321.SAA01224>