Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 14:46:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: gibbs@estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Justin T. Gibbs) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, peter@bonkers.taronga.com, terry@cs.weber.edu, PVinci@ix.netcom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: large filesystems/multiple disks [RAID] Message-ID: <199504042146.OAA03719@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199504042140.OAA12675@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Apr 4, 95 02:40:04 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >And you find these caches will fill up and some point in a sustained > >write test and you end up right back at the 20% performance loss I > >was talking about. > > Is this still true with hardware parity calculation? The problem is disk-contention, not CPU-speed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504042146.OAA03719>