Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:20:38 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, marcel@FreeBSD.ORG, Munehiro Matsuda <haro@tk.kubota.co.jp>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is texinfo needed for buildworld with -DNOINFO ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001190110130.16915-100000@alphplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20000118152012.A15591@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:47:27PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> How's that not a problem? The current Makefile.inc1 is written so,
> that bootstrap-tools are built with:
>
> BMAKE=${BMAKEENV} ${MAKE} -f Makefile.inc1 -DNOMAN -DNOINFO -DNOHTML
> ^^^^^^^^
> So, how inside the Makefile.inc1's bootstrap-tools: target I could know
> whether the user requested NOINFO, or Makefile.inc1 itself?
Oops. Makefile.inc1 always recurses to builds tools targets with
-DNOINFO, and the tools targets are (should be) internal, so the patch
is just an obfuscated way of removing texinfo from the list.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10001190110130.16915-100000>