Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 20:07:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> To: julian@freefall.cdrom.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: [DEVFS] thanks for the thoughts Message-ID: <199504200107.UAA03882@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199504192358.QAA03041@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 19, 95 04:58:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It looks as though the majority feeling is: > > /devs/disks/sd0 > /devs/disks/rsd0 > .... using bruce's naming scheme Sounds good, though I'd like to have a visible /devs/something/c0t0d0s0p0 interface as well. Having both views available is a good thing. (I like the System V /dev/rdsk vs /dev/dsk business rather than putting it down a level. That's a minor point, though... it's probably best to just go whichever way is easier to implement) > /devs/tapes/rst0 > /devs/tapes/nrst0 > /devs/ttys/00 /dev/ttys/tt00 /dev/ttys/cu00 You need nodes for both sides of the sio thing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504200107.UAA03882>