Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:39:17 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Patterson <mpatters@cs.uwaterloo.ca> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <1070843957.78821.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] V po, 08. 12. 2003 v 01:32, Mike Patterson píše: > > Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefiles > > headers. > > Not that it really matters to me, but if somebody contributes a port and > then drops it, and somebody else takes it over, why should that somebody > else not get credit for that, if credit is to be assigned? Maintaining > is just as important as the original submission, no? I misunderstood your point. I was under impression you only want to complete the list by adding missing entries under current "rules" [1]. If you're about to add all authors *and* maintainers than it's completely different question. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html -- Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> <pav@oook.cz> [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/08g1ntdYP8FOsoIRAlRFAJ9ehsGcW5RASFu+auGgE7AMmSsfuACgkaww 4L0r11bYRrlrKS8/ZvplLf0= =2AmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1070843957.78821.13.camel>