Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:39:17 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Patterson <mpatters@cs.uwaterloo.ca> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <1070843957.78821.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable V po, 08. 12. 2003 v 01:32, Mike Patterson p=ED=B9e: > > Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefile= s > > headers. >=20 > Not that it really matters to me, but if somebody contributes a port and=20 > then drops it, and somebody else takes it over, why should that somebody=20 > else not get credit for that, if credit is to be assigned? Maintaining=20 > is just as important as the original submission, no? I misunderstood your point. I was under impression you only want to complete the list by adding missing entries under current "rules" [1]. If you're about to add all authors *and* maintainers than it's completely different question. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting= .html --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> <pav@oook.cz> --=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/08g1ntdYP8FOsoIRAlRFAJ9ehsGcW5RASFu+auGgE7AMmSsfuACgkaww 4L0r11bYRrlrKS8/ZvplLf0= =2AmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1070843957.78821.13.camel>