Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:46:17 +0100 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> To: chukharev@mail.ru Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/129697: [patch] fix misbehavior of periodic/daily/100.clean-disks vs. port lang/sbcl Message-ID: <f19c444a1003140746u10f00567v4958cac3784f8a4c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201003141400.o2EE0K5x002889@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201003141400.o2EE0K5x002889@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, <chukharev@mail.ru> wrote: > The following reply was made to PR conf/129697; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: chukharev@mail.ru > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, chukharev@mail.ru > Cc: brucec@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: conf/129697: [patch] fix misbehavior of > periodic/daily/100.clean-disks vs. port lang/sbcl > Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:55:25 +0200 > > Very weird logic in the explanation why... With this logic, all ports which need *_enable="YES" > in rc.conf should never be fixed, which is definitely not the case. Well, if you want to enable this periodic script, you have to add this line to /etc/periodic.conf: daily_clean_disks_enable="YES" you can also add at the same time in this file: daily_clean_disks_files=whatever you want This logic is not weird and it does not apply to all ports. Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19c444a1003140746u10f00567v4958cac3784f8a4c>