Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 13:04:36 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AESNI driver and fpu_kern KPI Message-ID: <20100515110436.GA7224@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100515100401.GT83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100515100401.GT83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:04:01PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > I am interested in the problem reports and reviews. Maintainers of > !x86-oids are welcome to provide feedback whether they feel that > proposed KPI could be implemented on their architectures, or what > modifications they consider as needed to be able to implement > it. > FYI, sparc64 doesn't need such a KPI as it supports using the FPU in kernel unconditionally for ages. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100515110436.GA7224>