Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 May 2000 13:23:56 -0700
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com>
To:        Clarence Brown <clabrown@granitepost.com>
Cc:        'Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios' <kernel@tdnet.com.br>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD as a real-time solution?
Message-ID:  <3917225C.1485370C@3-cities.com>
References:  <005101bfb928$9837fe20$8c6896d1@granitepost.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Clarence Brown wrote:
> 
> I'm not a FreeBSD expert, but in "Dr. Dobb's Journal" #310 March 2000
> (www.ddj.com) there is an article title "Real-Time Linux" that discusses 2
> projects to bring real time to Linux. Perhaps these might also be applied to
> FreeBSD?
> 
> Also, define "precise time measurements". What is the rate and granularity
> that you need? If your DOS system is "working", why do you want to "fix" it?
> <grin>

Because on DOS the RTC's ganularity is 0.055 seconds. The RTC is
interrupted approximately 18.3 times a second. Not too accurate.

Kent

> 
> Mentioned in the article:
> 
> RTLinux
> at http://www.rtlinux.org,
> 
> Real Time Application Interface, (an offshoot of RTLinux with better
> timers?)
> at http://www.aero.polimi.it/projects/rtai
> 
> Cla.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of
> > Gustavo Vieira
> > Goncalves Coelho Rios
> > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 2:15 PM
> > To: Gilad Rom
> > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a Real-Time solution?
> >
> >
> > Gilad Rom wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have been using FreeBSD as a Server OS for a long time
> > with great success
> > > and satisfaction,
> > > and now the need has come for a new solution to our
> > production network,
> > > which has several 486/386 machines,
> > > that need a real time OS to monitor production status.
> > >
> > > Question is, could FreeBSD be made suitable for such tasks?
> > > Performance isnt an issue, but I need to make precise time
> > readings from the
> > > parallel port
> > > and timing is critical. Right now I am using DOS, which is
> > pretty much fine
> > > for that, but
> > > I want something better.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > -- Gilad.
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> > I think that FreeBSD is not a solution for your needs.
> > FreeBSD isn't bad, but that's not its focus.
> >
> > Try something like QNX and/or Neutrino (http://www.qnx.com).
> >
> > --
> > "Sometimes I worry about being a success in a mediocre world."
> >               -- Lily Tomlin
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kstewart@3-cities.com
http://www.3-cities.com/~kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/

SETI(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) @ HOME
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3917225C.1485370C>