Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:31:21 +0100 From: Anthony Ginepro <anthony.ginepro@laposte.net> To: Mark Huizer <freebsd@dohd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ULE is the default scheduler now Message-ID: <20040127193121.GA853@renaissance.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20040127130949.GA16650@eeyore.local.dohd.org> References: <20040124220826.P36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20040125201230.P96629@ganymede.hub.org> <20040127130949.GA16650@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:12:51PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Jeff, were you able to clear up the use of ULE on a single CPU machine > > with SMP enabled? > > > Here it works lousy on an AMD1800, single processor, SMP disabled. > > Running portupgrade gives very weird results in top. > Lots of system time, lots of processes, very little CPU time, process > doesn't respond to keys anymore. Trying ULE on 5.2-RELEASE : (I have a dnetc running in the background) portupgrade "feels" really slower (when updating the pkgdb mainly), interactive programs like mozilla works damn good (playing with tabs is now a real pleasure as a loading tab doesn't stuck so hard the others). Did people try Con Kolivas's benchmark tool used to finetune interactive linux scheduler ? (Or is there any BSD equivalent ?) Thanks a lot for your good work.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040127193121.GA853>