Date: 01 May 2000 14:39:10 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) Message-ID: <xzp8zxujvgx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Ben Smithurst's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2000 01:15:07 %2B0100" References: <xzp4s8lqde8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000430011507.A22035@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> writes: > I for one would rather at least -r were implemented before replacing the > current fetch(1). That's what I intended. Jordan's already made it quite clear that -r is a prerequisite. > Is your fetch(3)-based version available for download > anywhere? No up-to-date version. I have two slightly different versions on my home and work boxen and need to merge them before I can upload anything. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8zxujvgx.fsf>