Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 15:20:58 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> Cc: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, Harry Tabak <htabak@quadtelecom.com>, dever@getaclue.net, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter. Message-ID: <3E10D4DA.CDC52946@mindspring.com> References: <200212302317.gBUNHq176262@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dave Hayes wrote: > Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes: > > Yes, if you could stand the company you'd be keeping... > > Oh, Hi Terry! Listen, you know we are just going to go back and forth > until I start arguing the benefits of irrationality...so can we save > time and just start there? > > ;) Why don't we start with your response to my other message, about systems engineering and emergent a complex behaviours that result from simple rule sets? Personally, I'd like to argue about raising the cost of the sending of repeat SPAM, while leaving the cost of sending non-SPAM and/or initial SPAM, fixed. Are you arguing by omission that it's impossible to design such a system? If so, how do you address my example of the inability of people to deny the existance of gravity and inertia? Thanks, -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E10D4DA.CDC52946>