Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 12:55:42 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Mr. Mark Murray" <mark@grondar.za>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.20020509125542.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020509180605.A57805@energyhq.homeip.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 09-May-2002 Miguel Mendez wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:59:00AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>> > A symlink is a much more sensible solution to this problem and a
>> > redirector just seems to be creating a toy for the fun of it rather than
>> > to solve any real problem.
>>
>> A symlink to where?? You may not assume /usr/local.
>
> IMHO the symlink should only be created by the perl port install, so
> ${PREFIX}
> is honoured.
Ports should avoid messing with stuff outside of ${PREFIX} if they can
help it. Existing systems will already have a /usr/bin/perl on them
unless the user goes and removes it. People writing or executing scripts for
new systems can easily figure out something is wrong when they get:
/usr/bin/perl: not found
or some such. Just remove perl and let it be installed from the port.
As long as its documented in the release notes and UPDATING I don't think
this is a major concern.
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020509125542.jhb>