Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:14:01 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp -o xxx Message-ID: <200006261614.KAA19406@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "26 Jun 2000 10:30:01 %2B0200." <xzpu2eg26ba.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpu2eg26ba.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200006260434.WAA16059@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpu2eg26ba.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Warner Losh <imp@village.org> writes: : > fetch supports using -o to secify the output filename. However, ftp : > doesn't. Since fetch won't work with socks, I've been using ftp for : > all my fetching needs with ports for the past several years. Now, : > I've run into snag. Some ports fetch stuff into subdirectories using : > -o, so I was thinking of adding this to ftp. Comments? : : Wouldn't it be better to add socks support to fetch(1)? It would be better, maybe, but harder. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006261614.KAA19406>