Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:59:06 -0500
From:      Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/187594: [zfs] [patch] ZFS ARC behavior problem and fix [SB QUAR: Mon Jun 23 09:14:03 2014]
Message-ID:  <53A84ECA.6030308@denninger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140623161354.2fdd1289@suse3.ewadmin.local>
References:  <201405151530.s4FFU0d6050580@freefall.freebsd.org> <20140623161354.2fdd1289@suse3.ewadmin.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]

On 6/23/2014 9:13 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am Thu, 15 May 2014 15:30:00 GMT
> schrieb Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>:
>
>> The following reply was made to PR kern/187594; it has been noted by
>> GNATS.
>>
>> From: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>
>> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: kern/187594: [zfs] [patch] ZFS ARC behavior problem and
>> fix Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:05:34 -0500
>>
>>   This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>>   
>>   --------------ms050404000608010301080104
>>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>   Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>   
>>   I have now been running the latest delta as posted 26 March -- it
>> is=20 coming up on two months now, has been stable here and I've seen
>> several=20 positive reports and no negative ones on impact for
>> others. Performance=20 continues to be "as expected."
>>   
>>   Is there an expectation on this being merged forward and/or MFC'd?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm looking into applying your patch to one of my servers.
>
> However, I've got a question: can I apply it to stock 10.0?
> If I need to go 10-stable, which revision do you recommend?
>
>
> The server in question only has 32GB of RAM and I fear that once it
> does NFS in addition to MySQL, it will be bogged down.
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Rainer
>
It should apply cleanly to stock 10.0 but I have not checked it 
recently.  There was a change made in the VM defines by the rest of the 
team but I believe it is properly ifdef'd so as to figure it out and 
work both before and after.

-- 
-- Karl
karl@denninger.net



[-- Attachment #2 --]
0	*H
010	+0	*H
O0K030
	*H
010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1/0-	*H
	 customer-service@cudasystems.net0
130824190344Z
180823190344Z0[10	UUS10UFlorida10UKarl Denninger1!0	*H
	karl@denninger.net0"0
	*H
0
bi՞]MNԿawx?`)'ҴcWgR@BlWh+	u}ApdCFJVй~FOL}EW^bچYp3K&ׂ(R
lxڝ.xz?6&nsJ+1v9v/(kqĪp[vjcK%fϻe?iq]z
lyzFO'ppdX//Lw(3JIA*S#՟H[f|CGqJKooy.oEuOw$/섀$삻J9b|AP~8]D1YI<"""Y^T2iQ2b	yH)]	Ƶ0y$_N6XqMC 9՘	XgώjGTP"#nˋ"Bk100	U00	`HB0U0,	`HB
OpenSSL Generated Certificate0U|8˴d[20U#0]Af4U3x&^"408	`HB+)https://cudasystems.net:11443/revoked.crl0
	*H
gBwH]j\x`(&gW32"Uf^.^Iϱ
k!DQAg{(w/)\N'[oRW@CHO>)XrTNɘ!u`xt5(=f\-l3<@C6mnhv##1ŃbH͍_Nq
aʷ?rk$^9TIa!kh,D-ct1
00010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1/0-	*H
	 customer-service@cudasystems.net0	+;0	*H
	1	*H
0	*H
	1
140623155906Z0#	*H
	1$6t@ˑ=	{0l	*H
	1_0]0	`He*0	`He0
*H
0*H
0
*H
@0+0
*H
(0	+710010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1/0-	*H
	 customer-service@cudasystems.net0*H
	1010	UUS10UFlorida10U	Niceville10U
Cuda Systems LLC10UCuda Systems LLC CA1/0-	*H
	 customer-service@cudasystems.net0
	*H
\=L%m8g3j[Av 5΅Ӊ]-`	rxF7Ea׊LlYi
NvcΉNQ=UzI6dgz>
ZU EGl>8'1">K.ŧ5hez~.L
GGN= [)rcY_٠ٴ1IL#+Lj!ᔨ49<Ngw8̾2zI|vx,;Q-Z@S󤻸!RܹQf69x0+:iK!VG}W_DP9`N2Pg9%tZ:Y[UnE]tܳIP
TL+,'%o1Չk`N2ݛ=i!*2J4@<eS]
cQokr*'C.79';k̼^w(iA86h98

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53A84ECA.6030308>