Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:04:52 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: XEN and ZFS Status? Message-ID: <b1fa29170801240004n1dd25425jf0a343f2ab21eea6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11167f520801240002q178c8545qf5b2ce83c4627761@mail.gmail.com> References: <4797B923.6030400@gmail.com> <fn8jr8$9um$1@ger.gmane.org> <479804C6.4060001@samsco.org> <11167f520801240002q178c8545qf5b2ce83c4627761@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 24, 2008 12:02 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. <sfourman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 9:23 PM, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > > Ivan Voras wrote: > > > EchoB wrote: > > >> I have read somewhere that ZFS is experimental at best, > > > > > > Correct. > > > > > >> and wanted to confirm that. Also, using Xen would be a great plus in a > > >> production environment. > > > > > > Xen doesn't exist in 7.0, it may or may not be exist in 8.0. > > > > > > > Despite Ivan's brief and pessimistic assessment of Xen in FreeBSD, > > progress is quickly being made, and there's a pretty good chance that > > code will be made available soon for public testing. See Kip Macy's > > posting on this thread for more information. > > > > Scott > > dom0 on amd64? amd64 soonish, dom0 only if sponsored to do so or if a substantial amount of free time opens up. -Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170801240004n1dd25425jf0a343f2ab21eea6>