Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:05:07 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com>
Cc:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>, ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: System clock falls behind quickly on Mac mini G4
Message-ID:  <20140329130507.GA28559@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BWntOup7_98LoCLJ43xWc3magTArKNVUEHg_2v1UFWoGp=HJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140328071714.GA45961@regency.nsu.ru> <CAFY7cWBCFmtx4Tsg3=mSJyscpk5nCY3S6Sxy52TKEoTmy1sFPA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BWntOtEoqG_RJ2D9vSb7mO-UfT13RZbAb04p6rV2mWLBu=H9Q@mail.gmail.com> <20140329100134.GA7863@regency.nsu.ru> <CA%2BWntOup7_98LoCLJ43xWc3magTArKNVUEHg_2v1UFWoGp=HJQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:01:38AM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> wrote:
> > Why should I?  Esp. that G4 is not exactly top performant by today's
> > standards.  FreeBSD defaults work fine in most cases, so I don't touch
> > them unless there is a reason.
> 
> I found from building on a G3 400MHz, a G4 800MHz, and a G4 933MHz that
> increasing the clock rate to that value improved performance and decreased
> lag. Try and see for yourself. Even 1500 works better than 1000. My opinion
> based on observation.

Thanks for suggestion; I'll try.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140329130507.GA28559>