Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 03:40:16 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, Larry Sica <lomion@mac.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <xzpisvzzbzj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030205022413.01d3e9a8@popserver.sfu.ca> (Colin Percival's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2003 02:35:07 %2B0000") References: <3C66FB8E-3873-11D7-9842-000393A335A2@mac.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030204110551.00c54680@localhost> <3C66FB8E-3873-11D7-9842-000393A335A2@mac.com> <5.0.2.1.1.20030205022413.01d3e9a8@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> How about establishing a rule that -core must include at least one
> representative from each of {bin, ports, doc, advocacy}, and allowing
> anyone to stand for election (provided they are nominated by a
> committer)?
ports practically have their own core already (portmgr).
doc is not really a separate entity, every committer is expected to
work on documentation (though most don't unfortunately)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpisvzzbzj.fsf>