Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:37 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1) Message-ID: <fdb5a8$486$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <46F905FD.9060208@freebsd.org> References: <46F905FD.9060208@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Daichi GOTO wrote: > Hi Guys again > > Today is not unionfs. How is the unionfs patch progressing through re ? :) I hope it gets digested soon :) > We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests, > please try follow patch. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/ This looks useful, but shouldn't this feature be handled more globally, with a MAC policy or something like that? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG+RiHldnAQVacBcgRAyeZAKDRGofLg1ww1FbheoLvOppKYBqCqgCfS3Y8 G7772IoijDl0vkcQWS+l7s4= =fJ8E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fdb5a8$486$1>
