Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 14:29:23 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Jukka Huvinen <jhuvinen@cc.hut.fi> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tracking 4-stable rather than 4.8-stable Message-ID: <xzpptm53n8c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.50.0305260929210.382232-100000@lyta.hut.fi> (Jukka Huvinen's message of "Mon, 26 May 2003 09:38:19 %2B0300 (EET DST)") References: <3ED12C07.4080102@chez.com> <200305260127.12625.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <Pine.OSF.4.50.0305260929210.382232-100000@lyta.hut.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jukka Huvinen <jhuvinen@cc.hut.fi> writes: > If I update the ports collection with cvsup, it becomes to "current". > (tag=.) I think there is no alternative, tag=RELENG_4 does not fetch the > tree. ports-current != FreeBSD-CURRENT. The ports tree is not branched. Instead, the port Makefiles check the OS version and adapt their behaviour accordingly. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpptm53n8c.fsf>