Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:05:07 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> Cc: binup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: design issues Message-ID: <20011014180507.D2654@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org>; from eric@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 05:05:15PM -0700 References: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 05:05:15PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote:
> This weekend I sat down to work on some code for the binary updater, but I
> didn't really get anything done because I thought that a few important
> decisions where yet to be made, and really affect what I'm going to be
> working on next.
I don't think that the situation is any different than when this
project started.
> 1. I've heard speculation of an entirely new package framework, that would
It's been talked about plenty of times. Jordan wrote a several page
outline about what he wanted in a next generation package system
at least 18 months ago. I'm personally a big fan of incremental
change, and I would like to see the base system broken up using our
current package framework for 5.0.
# pkg_add bin.tgz
;)
- Murray
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7yjZCtNcQog5FH30RAknIAJ4oqBPp2345PInKxWtEi7Rs7/DbGwCcDyUo
KAP9Btm3xEB3BjicFcsJaxA=
=7jSQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011014180507.D2654>