Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:42:12 -0800 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> Cc: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: Intel gigabit driver Message-ID: <200111290042.fAT0gCA06193@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> of "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:50:40 %2B0100." <3C057850.55E9BC99@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What happend at Intel? Their driver is even released under the > BSD license! (and the Linux one under the GPL) Many Intel software products are released under a BSD-like license. Consider the ACPI CA codebase we use. > > The driver will be committed to -CURRENT first and MFC'ed to > > -STABLE later. > > Really? What about the gx driver? The 'gx' driver was committed so that Jonathan's code would be on record, since he'd spent so much time and effort on it. Testing so far has indicated that the Intel driver is generally superior, but it's not a very BSD-like driver and under some circumstances this can be considered a bad thing. The Intel driver will be the preferred driver for these cards. = Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111290042.fAT0gCA06193>