Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:00:29 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> To: Maxi Combina <maxicombina@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystems not properly unmounted [OT] Message-ID: <20050608200029.GA48139@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <285af08705060606255e26aa5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <285af087050603095356601a3d@mail.gmail.com> <200506061249.j56Cn1vd018910@lurza.secnetix.de> <285af08705060606255e26aa5b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# maxicombina@gmail.com / 2005-06-06 10:25:51 -0300:
> several linux distros have achieved a difficult goal: ease of
> installation-use combined with a stable system. (...) I think that
> there are a lot of linux distros out there that are really easy to
> use, and even more "friendly" or "beatiful" than windows. I dont
> think that FreeBSD has achieved this. (...)
> But I see it is not desktop oriented (I repeat, this seems ok for me.
> FreeBSD is better for a server station, not for a desktop).
I use FreeBSD 4.x on my desktop machines, also with excellent
results. I'm glad FreeBSD is different, that's why I use this
OS and not Windows or another OS that runs breakneck to achieve
its levels of idiot-friendliness.
I see two fallacies in your post:
* being further in the race to copycat Windows is an
achievement. Gee, why aren't all these people using Linux then?
* FreeBSD is a worse desktop operating system than Linux. How come
I haven't noticed during the last few years?
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050608200029.GA48139>