Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:12:18 -0800 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, Enache Adrian <enache@rdslink.ro>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile Message-ID: <20030127191218.A20027@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030128030545.GA564@HAL9000.homeunix.com>; from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU on Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:05:45PM -0800 References: <20030127211441.GC1043@ratsnest.hole> <20030127213635.GA30541@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20030127224012.GB903@ratsnest.hole> <20030128052915.B75252@iclub.nsu.ru> <20030127153830.A6348@FreeBSD.org> <20030128030545.GA564@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> [ Data: 2003-01-27 ] [ Subjecte: Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile ] > Thus spake Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>: > > * De: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> [ Data: 2003-01-27 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile ] > > > IIRC NetBSD has BSD-copyrighted ext2fs implementation > > > > Closely tied to their VFS implementation, which is different, of course, > > last I heard it was a fairly heavy task to port it, but something a lot > > of people would like to see. > > Does it work any better/worse than FreeBSD's implementation? Think about it: people don't have to be bothered by the license when they work on it, etc. -- Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030127191218.A20027>