Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:55:05 +0200 From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> Cc: gnn@FreeBSD.org, performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing... Message-ID: <D04C30EE-1CF6-4288-9605-B9216A986C91@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit> References: <m2hde3b3k8.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Aug 8, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Xin LI wrote: > =E5=9C=A8 2005-08-08=E4=B8=80=E7=9A=84 03:15 +0200=EF=BC=8CSuleiman = Souhlal=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > >> Hello, >> >> On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> >>> I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some >>> feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we >>> should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. >>> >> >> In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without >> HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance >> of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD. >> You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/=20 >> stuff/ >> compare_tiger-3.html . >> It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never >> slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster. >> > > Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks =20 > slower > than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEAD? I'm not sure, but I ran the benchmark on the same kernel several =20 times (after rebooting), and as gnn noticed, it seems like there is a =20= high variance for the tests that have 128k size things. Something =20 must be going on at those sizes. The results are at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/=20 compare_HEAD.html -- Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D04C30EE-1CF6-4288-9605-B9216A986C91>