Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:20:09 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@freebsd.org> To: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld) Message-ID: <20110121222008.GB65811@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20110120201740.GE24444@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20110120201740.GE24444@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hello, > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present > in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these > are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. > > vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could > easily expand the results and commit them to svn directly, alleviating > the need to run vgrind(1) during buildworld. > > OTOH, there are much more useful tools to vgrind(1) for source code > formatting. So do we still have vgrind(1) users out there? > > Regards, > Uli [trying to get this thread back on track] Does anyone actually care about vgrind in base? Will people be angry if I unroll the 2 cases where it is used under share/doc? Regards, Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110121222008.GB65811>