Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 12:44:20 -0700 From: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/1547 Message-ID: <199610231944.AA168419860@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Oct 1996 19:40:14 %2B1000." <199610230940.TAA29780@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's obviously still broken. A struct depends on MAX_TARGET which
> depends on SCSI_NCR_DFLT_TAGS which depends on FAILSAFE. I tested
> this. It is broken :-).
Can you tell me the name of the file that uses FAILSAFE? When Marc
contacted me, I said that I thought that the problem was gone because I
grep'd though the latest -current kernel sources and couldn't find any
references to FAILSAFE. I'm not running -current, and so I couldn't
verify this, unfortunately.
-- Darryl Okahata
Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610231944.AA168419860>