Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:49:13 +1100 From: George Abdelmalik <gabdelmalik@uniridge.com.au> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtc(1): reproducible segmentation fault Message-ID: <20151024224913.GA5266@barney.uniridge.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1445618437.91534.13.camel@freebsd.org> References: <562A3FE5.8020809@uniridge.com.au> <F6FF4D7B-C380-4410-8A4D-6E376DF76C7D@gmail.com> <1445618437.91534.13.camel@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40:37AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Don't cc me. I looked at the in-tree dtc code once and decided it's > too flawed to try to maintain, and it supports only a subset of the > full dts syntax. That's why we switched back to using the gnu dtc for > buildkernel. But I just discovered that for some reason gnu is not the > copy of dtc that gets installed, it's just the one that gets used > during a buildkernel. > > So basically if you do 'dtc -v' and the result is 0.4.0, that's too > limited to compile modern dts files, and if the result is 1.4.0 that's > the gnu dtc that should work fine, and if it doesn't we probably need > to report the problem upstream. > > -- Ian > Thanks Ian, The GPL dtc worked fine. I was actually wanting to compiler the in-tree zedbaord.dts file. I'd successfully done it some time back in June but must have been using the GPL dtc without realising it. George.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151024224913.GA5266>