Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:50:45 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: Olexander Kunytsa <kunia@istc.kiev.ua> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: standard-supfile and stable-supfile have no difference? Message-ID: <20010815235045.A40908@strontium.shef.vinosystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108160123280.24027-100000@wolf.istc.kiev.ua> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108160123280.24027-100000@wolf.istc.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Olexander Kunytsa wrote:
> It is pointed that 'standard-supfile' contains CVSup collections
> for FreeBSD-current source tree, but how does it differ from
> 'stable-supfile'?
standard-supfile in -stable now gets you the -stable sources, which
kinda makes sense really. Where does it say that it gets you the
-current sources? If it's somewhere in our documentation, please send
in a PR and someone will fix it.
cheers,
-ben
--
Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power To Serve
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7evzEbPzJ+yzvRCwRAnYTAJ97V4m5Cf/4FRZPXjZxalpnTa89AQCfb7KQ
lSSxzBFX4OvobJpzB2uH2RU=
=aaeI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010815235045.A40908>