Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:33:37 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Kirill Ponomarev <kp@krion.cc> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Salt on 2026Q3 Message-ID: <d8f2f886-2dc2-4bb2-b51d-7d8c90232e60@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <alSMIuyOUs8fRq5D@krion.cc> References: <edc098db-041d-47f2-b3d6-c145c92a8725@netfence.it> <alSMIuyOUs8fRq5D@krion.cc>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 7/13/26 08:56, Kirill Ponomarev wrote: > Hi Andrea, Hello and thanks for answering. > That said, until the 3008 port lands you can keep building 3006 on > Python 3.11 in Poudriere. The BROKEN marker is keyed on PYTHON_REL >= > 31200, so building against 3.11 sidesteps it. Scope it to a dedicated > set so only that set drops to 3.11 I tried, but I didn't succeed. This is probably ignorance on my part. So I was asking: how do I do this exactly? I tried "poudriere ... sysutils/py-salt@py311" and other commands, but they all failed in some way. > There's a working 3008.1 patch attached to the PR (#296290). Since you > said you depend on Salt on FreeBSD and are willing to help, testing > that patch against your own states would be genuinely useful, > especially anything touching zfs/sysrc/service. That's exactly the > feedback that'll tell me whether an in-place 3008 update is enough or > whether we need to sort out the FreeBSD extensions first. I will ASAP, but now I'd like to have a working 3006. BTW, if 3008 requires Python 3.14, which isn't the default, I think I'll get stuck on the same problem I have now with 3006/3.11 :( bye & Thanks av.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d8f2f886-2dc2-4bb2-b51d-7d8c90232e60>