Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 20:37:47 -0300 From: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>, Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with ipfw table add 0.0.0.0/8 Message-ID: <5377F2CB.5010406@bsdinfo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <5377F0BB.1040501@bsdinfo.com.br> References: <5371084F.1060009@bsdinfo.com.br> <F78BF3AC-F031-4528-A4C1-5B22E88CEC00@dataix.net> <5371112B.2030209@bsdinfo.com.br> <5371E9E7.70400@smartspb.net> <5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org> <53720AA4.80909@smartspb.net> <537767C5.80205@FreeBSD.org> <5377F0BB.1040501@bsdinfo.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 17/05/14 20:28, Marcelo Gondim escreveu: > Em 17/05/14 10:44, Alexander V. Chernikov escreveu: >> On 13.05.2014 16:05, Dennis Yusupoff wrote: >>> I think that universal table for all kind of data (ipv4, ipv6, ports, >>> etc) is a bad idea by design. At least unless you haven't any >>> ability to >> It is not always "universal" in kernel. >> Actually, different radix tables are used to store both IPv4 and IPv6 >> in single table. >>> specify address family on add, to avoid attempts to guess what user >>> meant. Something like "ipfw table X add DEEF.DE ipv6". >> I'm going to add explicit table type/naming setup soon. >> Idea is the following: >> >> 1) Existing table can be named and addressed by either number or name. >> However, you still need to assign table number manually. >> >> 2) Table type/name can be specified explicitly via one of the >> following commands: >> * ipfw table 1 create [type <cidr|u32|ifindex|iface>] [name >> "table_name"] >> * ipfw table <num|name> name "table_name" >> * ipfw table "table_name" type <cidr|u32|ifindex|iface> >> >> 3) ipfw(8) stops trying to guess appropriate type based on used >> value. Instead, >> it requests table type from kernel and interprets value according to >> returned type. >> Default type for all tables is cidr >> >> 4) Table(s) can be returned to default values using ipfw table >> <num|all|name> destroy. >> Destroy means: >> * flush >> * table tries (or other structures) freed >> * type set to cidr >> >> >>> >>> >>> 13.05.2014 14:32, Alexander V. Chernikov пишет: >>>> On 13.05.2014 13:46, Dennis Yusupoff wrote: >>>>> May be this will help? See answer on >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471 >>>> I'll try to fix it within a few days. >> Fixed in r266310. > The problem still exists. > > # ipfw table 99 add 0.0.0.0/8 > # ipfw table 99 list > ::/8 0 > > # uname -a > FreeBSD mail.xxxxxx.com.br 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #8 r266370: > Sat May 17 19:57:23 BRT 2014 > root@mail.xxxxxx.br:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GONDIM amd64 Ah! Sorry! Is still in the head.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5377F2CB.5010406>