Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Jan 1997 20:08:53 -0800 (PST)
From:      batie@agora.rdrop.com (Alan Batie)
To:        spork@super-g.com (spork)
Cc:        lenc@earth.infinetconsulting.com, drussell@internode.net, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 56K vs X2?
Message-ID:  <m0vnGT7-0008xjC@agora.rdrop.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970122225510.18266B-100000@super-g.inch.com> from "spork" at Jan 22, 97 11:02:16 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> One thing to remember amongst all this M$ reminiscent hype is that ALL of
> the 56K modems require a direct *digital* connection to the telco on one
> end (the server) to function.

That's why if I do it at all, I plan to do it as part of an ISDN upgrade,
where I suspect I won't be able to avoid it anyhow.

-- 
Alan Batie                   ______      It's not my fault!  It's some guy
batie@agora.rdrop.com        \    /      named "General Protection"!
+1 503 452-0960               \  /       --Ratbert
PGP FP: DE 3C 29 17 C0 49      \/        7A 27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9

It is my policy to avoid purchase of any products from companies which
use unrequested email advertisements or telephone solicitation.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0vnGT7-0008xjC>