Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:50:22 GMT From: Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/76871: vinum / does not find its second drive Message-ID: <200501302250.j0UMoM31036313@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/76871; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/76871: vinum / does not find its second drive Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:47:46 -0800 (PST) I would be glad, if you could talk less sharp to me, because it hurts me out of reasons, I do not want to disclose here. Of course I am willing to supply the needed and just the necessary information; but if I make you angry, I would be glad, if you could ignore me and my incompetence. Thank you. --- Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > [Format recovered--see > http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > How does this apply to the FreeBSD GNATS WebService? There is no hint, that the WebService will send non-conformant emails on my behalf... > Overlong text lines. > see above Btw.: Yahoo!Mail word wraps appropriately and automatically. > Corrected From: name. > > Note that your name contains a non-ASCII character. This is not > legal in mail headers, so your name shows as Wrner. > At least this can be fixed automatically, by using standardized mareshalloing techniques (I forgot the name; maybe MIME?). > >> Description: > > > After I used a 4.9-STABLE miniinst CD, vinum complained about > > missing subdisks. > > Your system is complaining about a missing drive: > Yes, now it complains about a missing drive until I type "vinum read". But this little catastrophe started with complaints about a missing subdisk (as far as I recall recorrectly; I am not so sure now anymore). > And now there are no missing subdisks. > Hmm... Yes. Although the subdisks on riddick are not really there... > > Here are both disklabels: > > These are not necessary. > Ok... > > Here is my vinum dumpconfig: > > From http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html: > Thank you for that URL. I did not know that... > What information to supply > > # Supply an extract of the Vinum history file. [...] > 30 Jan 2005 21:11:56.966397 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:11:56.982929 l 30 Jan 2005 21:19:41.343534 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:19:41.347558 l 30 Jan 2005 21:26:10.430451 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:11.742491 l 30 Jan 2005 21:26:32.444697 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:32.453870 read vaako 30 Jan 2005 21:26:35.759037 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:35.764422 read riddick 30 Jan 2005 21:26:38.060619 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:38.064933 l 30 Jan 2005 21:26:40.500892 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:40.505065 read 30 Jan 2005 21:26:43.013929 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:43.017874 l 30 Jan 2005 21:26:53.488841 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:26:53.493379 l 30 Jan 2005 21:32:19.887705 *** vinum started *** 30 Jan 2005 21:32:19.892726 dumpconfig > # Supply an extract of the file /var/log/messages. > Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: ad0: 38166MB <ST340015A/3.01> [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: ad1: 152627MB <SAMSUNG SP1604N/TM100-24> [310101/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100 [...] Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: vinum: incompatible sector sizes. base1 has 0, base has 512. Ignored. Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/vinum/base Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/vinum/base: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/vinum/base: clean, 147654 free (2870 frags, 18098 blocks, 1.1% fragmentation) Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/vinum/user: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/vinum/user: clean, 14704071 free (16567 frags, 1835938 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/ad1s1e: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS Jan 30 21:10:29 neo kernel: /dev/ad1s1e: clean, 31139884 free (8940 frags, 3891368 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) [...] Jan 30 21:26:32 neo kernel: vinum: no additional drives found ~ Jan 30 21:26:35 neo kernel: vinum: no additional drives foundodified: line 1 Jan 30 21:26:40 neo kernel: vinum: already read config from vaako Jan 30 21:26:40 neo kernel: vinum: updating configuration from /dev/ad1s1d Jan 30 21:26:40 neo kernel: vinum: incompatible sector sizes. base1 has 0, base has 512. Ignored. Jan 30 21:26:40 neo kernel: vinum: incompatible sector sizes. user1 has 0, user has 512. Ignored. Answer for your other questions: 1. I did not change the vinum source code, so it is FreeBSD R5.3's vinum. 2. Maybe I should make my problem more clear: Everytime the system comes up after a reboot, drive riddick is referenced but missing (no /dev/... value). When I type "vinum read" vinum finds the missing drive. -Arne __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501302250.j0UMoM31036313>