Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 19:37:01 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> To: Scott <gsi22419@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU> Cc: Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios <kernel@tdnet.com.br>, shannon stees <shadyshay@hotmail.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: researching FreeBSD Message-ID: <20000508193701.A55455@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.3.96.1000508140546.27716A-100000@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU> References: <3916CF65.8BC7835A@tdnet.com.br> <Pine.A41.3.96.1000508140546.27716A-100000@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Scott wrote:
> This question and your answer makes me wonder. Are there no ASM
> optimizations that have been made?
Yes, but the vast majority of it is C.
ben@magnesium:~$ locate "/usr/src/*.[Ss]" | wc -l
243
ben@magnesium:~$ locate "/usr/src/*.c" | wc -l
7127
Don't take this as meaning the ratio of C to assembler is 30:1, since
the .c files may well be much bigger, the .s files are usually just
one routine which has been optimized (e.g. some libc functions in
/usr/src/lib/libc/i386). There is almost certainly more C and less
assembler than 30:1.
--
Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000508193701.A55455>