Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:10:56 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu) Message-ID: <op.t56f0ir79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200802071801.38477.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org> <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <200802071801.38477.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:01:36 -0600, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:42 по, Pav Lucistnik Ви написали: >> > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the >> > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need >> > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump? >> >> Where are the patches? > > Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in > fact, > contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that > aside, let's continue... > > The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches > (implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw. > Pointing it out should be sufficient. What about the users that who are using ports, not packages? The PORTREVISION is need or/and add info in /usr/ports/UPDATING about reinstall these ports that depend on icu. Cheers, Mezz > Best, > > -mi -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.t56f0ir79aq2h7>