Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:33:30 -0800
From:      Wes Peters <wes@opensail.org>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ident daemon: oIdentd creating a lot of processes
Message-ID:  <C50784F7-3826-417F-ACAF-FA74C410F908@opensail.org>
In-Reply-To: <86bq7fntxx.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <20080120120016.6EBDA16A4DF@hub.freebsd.org> <9019C94F-5618-44F3-9590-D63C19A36B60@opensail.org> <86bq7fntxx.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:

> Wes Peters <wes@opensail.org> writes:
>> Fabian Wenk <fabian@wenks.ch> writes:
>>> Is there a reason why you do not use the identd from FreeBSD itself?
>> Alternativey, use 'liedentd' from ports and it won't give away
>> information about your users.  It also won't create any additional
>> processes - I promise.
>
> uh, inetd's own identd can also be configured to not reveal any
> information, and doesn't create any additional processes either, so
> what's your upside?

Not having to run inetd?  No configuration?  Simple, easy to audit code?

--
            Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters                                                     =
wes@opensail.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C50784F7-3826-417F-ACAF-FA74C410F908>