Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:39:13 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194210 - head/sys/sys Message-ID: <4A365D11.50503@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20090615.000909.-1219445083.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200906141953.n5EJrqg5058709@svn.freebsd.org> <1245014030.12125.34.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20090615.000909.-1219445083.imp@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <1245014030.12125.34.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> > Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> writes: > : On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:53 +0000, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > : > Author: simon > : > Date: Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 > : > New Revision: 194210 > : > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194210 > : > > : > Log: > : > Bump __FreeBSD_version for OpenSSL 0.9.8k import. > : > > : > Modified: > : > head/sys/sys/param.h > : > > : > Modified: head/sys/sys/param.h > : > ============================================================================== > : > --- head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:51:43 2009 (r194209) > : > +++ head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 (r194210) > : > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ > : > * is created, otherwise 1. > : > */ > : > #undef __FreeBSD_version > : > -#define __FreeBSD_version 800097 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > : > +#define __FreeBSD_version 800098 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > : > > : > #ifndef LOCORE > : > #include <sys/types.h> > : > : It's been suggested we change the heuristic to be stable branches start > : with 200. I think we're going to do that so don't panic about there > : only being one number left for changes between now and the time we > : branch. > > Why not 500? > > : At first it surprised me we ate through almost 100 version numbers in > : head, which is a place traditionally abi changes are *expected* and the > : attitude has more or less been head is a free-for-all with all bets off. > : But some IRC chatter enlightened me to there actually being people who > : do advanced testing of ports and whatnot in head under the encouragement > : of portmgr@ despite its free-for-all nature to try and cut down on work > : during later stages of the release. That seems reasonable so I think in > : general starting to give more than 100 bumps to work with in head is > : worthwhile. > > I think so too. If we're going to change, we might as well change big > and infrequently. > netbsd reserves 4 digits. I've never bought the idea that people can ignore ABI changes (even in HEAD). But not recording an incompatibility is just stupid. Samhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A365D11.50503>