Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:39:13 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194210 - head/sys/sys Message-ID: <4A365D11.50503@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20090615.000909.-1219445083.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200906141953.n5EJrqg5058709@svn.freebsd.org> <1245014030.12125.34.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20090615.000909.-1219445083.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <1245014030.12125.34.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> > Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> writes: > : On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:53 +0000, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > : > Author: simon > : > Date: Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 > : > New Revision: 194210 > : > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194210 > : > > : > Log: > : > Bump __FreeBSD_version for OpenSSL 0.9.8k import. > : > > : > Modified: > : > head/sys/sys/param.h > : > > : > Modified: head/sys/sys/param.h > : > ============================================================================== > : > --- head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:51:43 2009 (r194209) > : > +++ head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 (r194210) > : > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ > : > * is created, otherwise 1. > : > */ > : > #undef __FreeBSD_version > : > -#define __FreeBSD_version 800097 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > : > +#define __FreeBSD_version 800098 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > : > > : > #ifndef LOCORE > : > #include <sys/types.h> > : > : It's been suggested we change the heuristic to be stable branches start > : with 200. I think we're going to do that so don't panic about there > : only being one number left for changes between now and the time we > : branch. > > Why not 500? > > : At first it surprised me we ate through almost 100 version numbers in > : head, which is a place traditionally abi changes are *expected* and the > : attitude has more or less been head is a free-for-all with all bets off. > : But some IRC chatter enlightened me to there actually being people who > : do advanced testing of ports and whatnot in head under the encouragement > : of portmgr@ despite its free-for-all nature to try and cut down on work > : during later stages of the release. That seems reasonable so I think in > : general starting to give more than 100 bumps to work with in head is > : worthwhile. > > I think so too. If we're going to change, we might as well change big > and infrequently. > netbsd reserves 4 digits. I've never bought the idea that people can ignore ABI changes (even in HEAD). But not recording an incompatibility is just stupid. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A365D11.50503>