Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:42:20 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> Cc: Edho Arief <edho@myconan.net>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <BA94EF30-6058-41A4-8D2E-4F362CC69501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMVU60ZRfOG4fCiz30BnAURCLbRgA0bdWjhNkQZnYQkMqB14sA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com> <20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan> <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAJ-VmomWnAvsVPcK0mfFECvFw_FKcja1m3NE9ue=TOkF%2Bx14Xg@mail.gmail.com> <CANY-Wm8jbtr3tiwdGQMDx8SVZKEBspGwTV7Q0wziYWsV%2Bf3BSQ@mail.gmail.com> <6140271.20111219122721@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CANY-Wm9-JTN0gvjoRv4XFMDaweoPSoZ4erTUto3Z-s1LxqGzhg@mail.gmail.com> <CABTjkKmRQ-hc2kKpCCrj4AmChXA59ErXeTHnt0oJSTEBFi-apw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPJF9wmgMi6XJrtETmHcv%2BMHP22V4xKkixTqxQYaej6RyViPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMVU60ZRfOG4fCiz30BnAURCLbRgA0bdWjhNkQZnYQkMqB14sA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow = <yerenkow@gmail.com> wrote: >> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in = touch, you >> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've = just >> found recently (my shame of course) in mail list that there is = service ( >> pub.allbsd.org) which constantly building current versions. This is = great, >> but at homepage of freebsd.org there is no word about it :) >=20 > That's because it's not official. Do you take the risk? Would a > multi-milion-dollar company do that? > For your private server, sure it's probably fine. But how do you know > that those files are not contaminated? > (That being said, the purpose of that service is good. And the files > there a most probably 100% fine. But if it's not official... then..) As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream = source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get = my images from. -Garrett=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BA94EF30-6058-41A4-8D2E-4F362CC69501>